Archive for January, 2009

Movie TV Spots in the Super Bowl

Saturday, January 31st, 2009

Yesterday I found this great graph at the New York Times.  It looks at the history of ads during the Super Bowl.  On first glance, I was interested in the following:

  • 42% of the ads were humorous in 2002.  That number rose to 83% last year.  Effect of 9/11.
  • There were 17 dot-com ads in 2000, and only 3 in 2001.  Effect of the dot-com bubble burst.
  • Animals are always involved between 15-30% of the ads.
  • The rise of Film Studios using the Super Bowl to market their films.

It’s this last point that I wish to explore a little more.  I’ve listed each year that had a TV spot from a film, and placed it’s ranking in Box Office on the year of release.

1987: Over the Top (50+)
I’m amused to see that Over the Top was the first movie to have a TV spot in the Super Bowl.  It didn’t make the top 50 that year and only made $16 million.   This is probably why another Film wouldn’t be in the Super Bowl for 4 more years.

1991: King Ralph (40), The Doors (39)
These are two totally different movies that each had spots in the Super Bowl.  They both did ok and were right next to each other in rankings.

1992: Shining Through (50+), Stop! Or My Mom Will Shoot! (46)
I’ve never heard of Shining Through and Stop! or My Mom Will Shoot! is really awful.  Not a very good year for movies in the Super Bowl.

1993: Groundhog Day (13), Cliffhanger (10), Falling Down (37), A Few Good Men (5)
This is clearly the best year up to this point.  A Few Good Men’s ranking is actually from 1992 since it was released in December of that year.  Still, three in the top 15.

1994: Getaway (50+), Sugar Hill (50+), On Deadly Ground (37)
Getaway & Sugar Hill were flops and On Deadly Ground did alright.

1995: Just Cause (47)
Obviously 1994′s failures effected 1995 with only one entry.  Once again, mediocre box office numbers.

1996: Independence Day (1)
Huge box office numbers and look at the result below.

1997: The Devil’s Own (50+), Men in Black (2), The Saint (28), Liar Liar (4), Dante’s Peak (22), The Lost World (3), Private Parts (50+), The 5th Element (26)
Three of the top 4 films from 1997 (Titanic was #1) and two others in the top 30.

1998: Sphere (50+), Lost in Space (30), The Wedding Singer (24), The Mask of Zorro (19), Armageddon (2), Mercury Rising (50+)
I’m not sure why there are so many Space movies but the Super Bowl doesn’t help out Sphere or Mercury Rising. Obviously, Armageddon is the big winner here.

1999: Austin Powers (4), The Mummy (8), EdTV (50+), The Matrix (5), Wild Wild West (17)
Three of the top 8.  I’m shocked to see Wild Wild West in the top 20.

2000: Titan A.E. (50+), Mission to Mars (41), Gladiator (4), Nutty Professor II (16), U-571 (28)
Gladiator & Nutty Professor II benefit, but the others aren’t helped too much.

2001: A Knight’s Tale (45), Hannibal (12), Mummy Returns (6), Swordfish (35), Exit Wounds (49)
Two in the top 12 and all of them are in the top 50.  I forgot Hannibal did so well.

2002: Austin Powers in Goldmember (7), Blade 2 (31), Hart’s War (109), 40 Days and 40 Nights (71), XXX (15), Signs (6), Collateral Damage (66), Bad Company (88), Scorpion King (29), Frankenstein (150+)
Signs & Austin Powers 2 are big hits, but Frankenstein is a huge flop.

2003: Daredevil (27), Anger Management (12), Bad Boys 2 (11), Charlie’s Angels: Full Throttle (29), The Hulk (14), Bruce Almighty (5), The Recruit (55), The Matrix Revolutions (9), Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines (8)
Three in the top 10, with three more in the top 14  and two others in the top 30.  I’d say this is a pretty successful year.  Who would have thought in 1999 that a third Terminator would do better than a third Matrix?

2004: Secret Window (67), 50 First Dates (15), Van Helsing (16), Ladykillers (76), Hildalgo (42), The Alamo (101), Miracle (47), Troy (13), Starsky and Hutch (26)

Three in the top 16, but the rest are pretty mediocre.  The Alamo is a huge flop.

2005: Robots (15), The Pacifier (17), Be Cool (48), War of the Worlds (4), The Longest Yard (12), Sahara (35), Hitch (11), Constantine (29), Batman Begins (8)

Before I looked this up, I thought it would be a failure outside of War of the Worlds and Batman Begins.  I guess I was wrong with all of them in the top 50 and six in the top 17.  I didn’t remember The Pacifier, Robots or The Longest Yard being so successful.

2006: The World’s Fastest Indian (150+), Running Scared (150+), Mission Impossible III (14), Cars (3), Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest (1), 16 Blocks (86), Poseidon (49), V for Vendetta (36)

I think The World’s Fastest Indian is the strangest movie to have a Super Bowl ad.  Obviously Cars and Pirates of the Caribbean enjoy big years.

2007: Pride (150+), Hannibal Rising (90), Wild Hogs (13), Meet the Robinsons (29)
Pride is a failure and I completely forgot about Hannibal Rising.  Outside of Wild Hogs, not a good year for films in the Super Bowl.

2008: Wanted (16), Iron Man (2), Leatherheads (92), Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian (13), Wall-E (5), Jumper (37), Don’t Mess with Zohan (28)
Iron Man & Wall-E are big hits with Wanted & Chronicles of Narnia rounding out the top 16.  Even though it’s about football, Leatherheads doesn’t enjoy much success.

Top 5 Albums of 2008

Thursday, January 29th, 2009

I’m about to buy Bruce Springsteen’s Working on a Dream from iTunes. This will be my first purchase of 2009 music, so I thought it would be a good time to list out my favorite albums from 2008.

  1. For Emma, Forever Ago – Bon Iver

    This is an album that I have loved from the beginning. It’s a breakup album that makes me wish I had gone thru a messy breakup. It’s refreshing to hear an acoustic guitar album that sounds this exciting. It was also recorded in a cabin in northwestern Wisconsin last winter, which gives it an interesting backstory and a little character. I was lucky enough to see Bon Iver live last month in Madison.

    Best Song: Skinny Love

  2. Fleet Foxes – Fleet Foxes

    Another album with a wintery feel to it. The Fleet Foxes sound like a folksy version of the Shins. It’s pure pop, but they sound more genuine than the Shins. I’ve had a few arguments with friends who feel the Fleet Foxes are overrated. This is an example of those friends being wrong.

    Best Song – White Winter Hymnal

  3. Everything that Happens will Happen Today – David Byrne & Brian Eno

    While the first two albums on this list were no-brainers, the rest of the top 5 was more difficult for me to figure out. I’m a Talking Heads fan, so I was excited about the new Byrne/Eno collaboration. While Everything that Happens isn’t as good as their Talking Heads albums, it’s still a very enjoyable album (and honestly, probably not fair to hold it up to that standard). It’s probably the most optimistic album I’ve heard this year and makes getting older seem ok. I was lucky enough to see David Byrne live in Milwaukee this fall.

    Best Song: Strange Overtones

  4. Vampire Weekend – Vampire Weekend

    This is the 3rd Debut album on this list, but it’s much different than Bon Iver & the Fleet Foxes. Whereas those are perfect Winter albums, Vampire Weekend is already one of my favorite summer listens. I find their music difficult to explain, but they sound like how you feel watching a Wes Anderson film.

    Best Song: M79

  5. Dear Science – TV on the Radio

    When this album came out, most were saying it was probably the best album of 2008. While this is an enjoyable listen, I still don’t think they have came out with a great album yet. All three of their releases are very good, but lack the emotional punch needed for greatness. Still, if you aren’t familiar with TV on the Radio, this is a great place to start.

    Best Song: Family Tree

Just Missed: 808s & Heartbreak – Kanye West, Shallow Grave – The Tallest Man on Earth, Saturdays=Youth – M83

Review: Sony HTCT100 Sound Bar

Monday, January 26th, 2009

A few friends have asked me to review my Sony Soundbar system, so here it is.  When Molly and I moved into the new house, I wanted a new sound system for the living room.  My plan was to move my current 5.1 system to the basement and purchase a different sound system for the main room.  After searching for awhile, I found the perfect solution in the Sony HTCT100 Sound Bar system.

The Sony HTCT100 filled multiple needs with just one purchase.  I wanted to find something that was unobtrusive.  The last thing I wanted to deal with was a bunch of wires in our living room.  The room that the system would be hooked up to had wood floors, making it difficult to hide wires.  The Sony HTCT100 fit this need since it is simply two components, a Sound Bar and a Subwoofer.  I placed the Sound Bar in front of our 37″ Vizio HD TV and I placed the Subwoofer on the floor next to the TV stand.

The other great thing about the Sony HTCT100 is the subwoofer is actually a receiver as well.  It has 3 HDMI Inputs (and 1 output) along 3 Optical Inputs, a COAX and an RCA input.  This has allowed me to hook up a DVD player (HDMI), Xbox 360 (HDMI), a Record Player (RCA) and the audio out of my HD antenna.  All of this then connects into my HDTV with an HDMI.

The sound itself is quite nice.  It works perfect for a small space and is able to replicate surround sound pretty well with it’s 3.1 stereo system.  It also has individual levels for the Sound Bar and the Subwoofer and an LCD display on the Subwoofer.  I’ve had this system for over 6 months now and it’s worked out great.  It functions as a receiver and a superb sound system for the upstairs without the hassle of wires running everywhere.

As for negatives, there are only a few issues I can think of.  Even though the subwoofer has an LCD display, the Sound Bar is actually the component that picks up the Remote’s signal.  It works fine, but I find myself pointing at the Subwoofer sometimes.  Also, the names for the Inputs cannot be adjusted, so if you plug in Blu-Ray into the DVD input, it will still say DVD.  Also, there isn’t a direct iPod hook up, instead Sony wants you to purchase their proprietary adaptor. This can be offset by just using RCA.  Still, pretty minor issues.

As for the price, it might seem a bit high, but remember you are paying for a 3.1 Sound Bar system and a Receiver all in one.  So, it’s pretty reasonable.  I think this is perfect for either a small area or a room in the house that you wish to avoid stringing wires around the walls or across the floor.

Sony HTCT100 Sound Bar with Sub-Woofer – Black

$43 Million, really?

Saturday, January 24th, 2009

From January 16-22, the number one movie in America was Paul Blart: Mall Cop. It made $43 million. 43 Million Dollars! I’m amazed.

Every year, there is some awful movie that is marketed and advertised for months before it’s release. Every year, I think “there is no way this movie will do well.” And every year, said movie is a success. I just don’t understand it.

Lets take a look at Paul Blart: Mall Cop.

Is it a sequel or a spin-off?

No, it appears that this is an original idea.  I could go on about how that makes the movie even sadder, but instead, listen to Patton Oswalt talk about Death Bed.

Is it a good idea for a movie?

An inept rent-a-cop.  It sounds funny for 30 seconds.  An obvious joke everyone makes when they are in a mall.  A joke that gets a chuckle and everyone moves on.  Somehow, it’s going to get stretched into a 90 minute comedy.

Does it have any stars?

It has Kevin James.  I guess people like King of Queens, but I wouldn’t consider him much of a star.  He was a co-star in Hitch & I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry, but I’m guessing Will Smith and Adam Sandler were the bigger draws in both those films.

Does it look funny?

Sometimes a comedy like this will have a funny trailer that includes all of the best gags.  This trailer does not have any funny scenes.  It’s just 2 minutes of a Segway and Kevin James falling down and running into people.

Are reviews good?

Nope, 27% on Rotten Tomatoes.  One of the positive reviews states, “Laughs occasionally ensue.”  I wonder if it happens the first time Kevin James falls down.

Why did so many people go see it?

I don’t know.  I mean, it’s a weak year for the Oscars, but there are better options than this.  Outside of that, it’s PG so maybe it’s just the family effect.  Even then, stay home and save some money and just re-watch WALL-E.

Re: Hope we believe in

Thursday, January 22nd, 2009

The following is a repost of a Note that my friend, Matt S, wrote on Facebook. I’ll follow up with my comments.

Hope we believe in; what are we hopeful about

Disclaimer: I realize that not everyone who reads this email will agree with all that I say. I also recognize that there are many other opinions, religions, etc represented by those on Facebook who will read this. I welcome comments to what I’ve said below, but do ask that you please be respectful of all comments read. Thanks, yall!

Hope

I just had a brief, but thought provoking conversation with my roommate, Ryan. What we talked about really stimulated my thinking and while I rarely do “notes” or “blogs” I really wanted to write about this.

So the big question is this: What are we hopeful about?

I watched intently the events of this historic day with much excitement and awe of what was really happening. I’m a southerner, and I will admit I never thought I’d see a black president, and certainly thought there would be a woman president before a black one. But I was wrong, and I’m glad I was. This is awesome. It is truly a great moment for our country.

That being said, we’ve heard a lot about hope throughout the campaign, election, etc. President Obama focused his campaign around the message of hope. Hope is a powerful thing. It has the ability to bind many people together. It can turn a negative to a positive. It can bring joy to many lives. The definition of hope, according to my good friend Miriam Webster, is to “cherish a desire with expectation” or to “expect with confidence.”

But where do we really find hope? Is hope found in the political policies of the leader of our great country, or is hope found in something “larger than life?” Is hope found in an economy that starts to flourish, with 401Ks busting at the seems and the value of home skyrocketing – both of which will one day mean absolutely nothing, zero, zilch to any of us after we die (remember, it all goes back in the box), or is hope found in real estate that will last well beyond our few years of physical life on earth? Is true hope found in $150M in money spent on the frills and glitz of January 20, 2009, or is hope found in the guarantee of eternal life that comes through the one and only triune God, who sent His son, Jesus, to die for the sins of all people?

Furthermore, is hope and “change we can believe in” something that is going to happen politically, with a new president, or is this hope and change going to come through people of this great country who step out and roll up their sleeves and help their neighbors in need – the “least of these?” Do we say “yes we can” to politics and great leaders that will lead for a few years, or do we say “yes we can” to serving a cause greater than ourselves?

Now don’t get me wrong, I believe strongly in our new president. It was a thrill to watch the events of today. I must admit, I spent way too much time at work watching feeds online (sorry State Bar). It was historic, and I love history and politics. Heck, I really think President Obama will do a fabulous job as president, and will guide this nation forward in a direction we need to go (sans his abortion/pro-choice agenda and his ideas of a big-spend agenda, but that’s another note). I’m not saying Obama won’t be a wonderful and successful president. In fact, I believe and pray for quite the opposite – that he’ll be tremendously successful and do a wonderful job as president. I think the way he’s been able to rally this country, and the American people is an unbelievably awesome thing, and comes at a time when people truly are longing for something more….hoping for a greater time ahead.

What I AM saying, though – and what Ryan and I talked about today – is that we’ve watched now for months as Obama has rallied this country and sparked them to hope for and believe in something great. But is that the true hope we should believe in? This hope is only temporary. It will last for a while, then the President will do something that even the most Liberal of politicians dislike (Nancy Pelosi is already outwardly disagreeing with Obama). This hope will last for a while, the economy will make a gigantic swing upward, and folks will be so excited, but then it will more than likely drop again one day.

I’m just worried that millions upon millions of Americans are now hoping in a person, in political policies, and in government (and the changes that just took place in our government) that will only last for a short while. The reality is that life will go well beyond the 44th president and the political landscape this country is currently mapping out. I’m nervous that folks are going to be too tied up in something that will only fade, and fade quickly. The truth of the matter is that if we really want to find hope, we ought to seek it in the Eternal; in the Almighty; in the triune God. Perhaps we should be encouraging folks to seek hope and authentic change in the life-giving power of the Blood of Jesus Christ.

That, my friends, is hope. That is “change we can believe in” (it sure as heck changed me tremendously…if you don’t know how, just ask). We can put our hope in a wonderful, merciful, gracious God that has promised us that if we believe in His son, who He sent to this earth to die for our sins, so that we will have eternal life (John 3:16, the Matt Sally phrase).

Is anyone up for some eternal and authentic hope like this? What if we take this hope to our country and our world? I think it’ll change the lives of many, many people. I think we can take this hope to those who need it…do you?“Yes we can!”

Peace,
Matt

For another reasource on hope, see: http://blackhawk.s405.sureserver.com/resources/sermon_lib.php#

First off, I find Matt’s excitement and faith in this post to be infectious and intoxicating. It’s good for him and it’s good for his own faith. It’s clearly genuine and that means a lot.

With all of that said, I disagree. The obvious core reason I disagree is simply a difference in worldview. Matt, like so many others, believes in Christ. I don’t. He’s a christian, I’m an atheist.

The main question posed in Matt’s note is, What are we hopeful about? Matt argues that the hope in Obama is a fleeting hope. Regardless of his presidency, this hope will fade away. Things will rebound (or they won’t) and that hope in Obama will be gone. Then what? Matt argues that all of that hope is best placed into Jesus Christ. That hope won’t go away and it will last into the next lifetime.

Is true hope found in $150M in money spent on the frills and glitz of January 20, 2009, or is hope found in the guarantee of eternal life that comes through the one and only triune God, who sent His son, Jesus, to die for the sins of all people?

Regarding Obama, true hope begin in 2004 during the Democratic National Convention and his “United States of America” speech. That hope continued into January of 2008 when he announced his candidacy for president in Springfield, IL. That continued thru the primaries when he ran a 50 state grass roots campaign. That hope was re-affirmed during his “Yes We Can” speech in New Hampshire, his racism speech in Philadelphia and his 2008 DNC speech. Finally, that hope is the reason he was able to win the election in November and give the Inaugural address he gave on January 20.

There are a lot of decisions and possibilities up ahead for the Obama administration. Economy, Iraq, Afghanistan, Universal Health Care, Renewable Energy, Education, Civil Rights, Immigration, etc. Real issues that Obama has an opportunity to make decisions on that will have effects that every American will feel.

The consequences of these decisions will not fade quickly. Even though the hope in FDR has faded, the ramifications of The New Deal have not. Presidents have lasting legacies, especially when they are in office during turbulent times. The hope for Obama is that he will deliver.

Now, the big question, what about the hope of Jesus Christ? I understand Matt’s argument about Jesus as a hope that won’t go away. It’s much easier to pour your love and heart into something that won’t go away than it is to pour it into another person. People are mortal and will eventually pass away. It’s painful when that happens and I’ve often envied people who can use their faith and Jesus to get thru that. It seems easier to me and even effective, and definitely less painful. Does that make it better?

I don’t think so. I’d rather get thru those moments with the help of other people. Obviously it can turn into a painful loop, since those people eventually pass away. Still, that’s what life is about. It’s about relationships and moments, and I don’t want to sacrifice any of that for something that I’m supposed to believe in. Something I’ve been taught, but never felt, heard or seen. It seems like that’s the easy way out, another way of dulling the harsh realities of life.

I know the common counter argument will be that Jesus Christ is love, and he’s part of those relationships that one has with others. I think that seems like a convenient rational than anything real. I’m not concerned with what happens to me in the afterlife, or others. I honestly don’t even care. Once that person is gone, they are gone. I’m more concerned with their well being now and during their life.

Which brings us back to Barack Obama. I do have hope that his decisions will improve the well-being of strangers, friends, family and myself. These decisions will have an impact greater than just my own lifetime. That’s change I believe in.

Note: Thoughts on sacrifice and Religion – Here is the response another friend had to the note.